Discussion about this post

User's avatar
NA's avatar

I read the APA (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788965/000110465926069138/hnrg-20260530xex10d1.htm) and it more reads that the cash is put into an escrow account (it is not released to EWC). The first US$132.5 million of the final tranche, less holdbacks, is released only after Siemens’ conformity assessment. The remaining balance is released only when the required turbine restoration work has been completed, again net of holdbacks. EWC’s US$331 million estimate assumes no material deterioration from the US$22 million baseline restoration estimate. Under the contract:

Hallador bears the first US$22 million of restoration.

The next US$22 million is shared equally.

Above US$44 million, EWC bears every additional dollar.

EWC’s contractual restoration liability is capped at US$315 million.

Delay damages are US$175,000 per day, capped at US$17.5 million.

The purchase-price allocation is redacted, while the agreement permits that portion of the transaction to be terminated if specified Siemens work is NOT completed by the long-stop date. We therefore cannot quantify how much of the US$350 million is attached to that turbine.

I know you said no debt, but @ 31 December 2025, EWC reported:

US$12.0 million of cash;

US$46.5 million of total liabilities;

US$37.7 million of current liabilities;

US$18.5 million of net current liabilities; and

a material uncertainty concerning going concern.

By 30 June, cash had fallen to US$6.694 million. EWC had used US$13.215 million in operating cash during the financial year and had no undrawn financing facilities.

Buyer;s credit agreement also contains a conditional US$45 million delayed-draw term loan. Even adding that to the March liquidity gives US$142.5 million, versus US$315 million of later EWC purchase payments—and Hallador estimates another roughly US$100 million of transport, insurance, logistics and refurbishment expenditure.

Lastly, the Pagbilao site involves a disclosed related-party lease. The terminal and Sengkang are potentially valuable options, but they can also be negative-value options for minority shareholders if exercised with too much capital.

NA's avatar

Yes, my point is that they have to fund $100mm of transport etc. Likely out of FCF.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?