1) As I am aware there is no Analyst coverage for the stock right?
2) Have you found any secondary sources for the Texas Court Cases or did you dig into the statements of charge to find numbers for the requested compensation for damages?
It's in the court documents if you dig around. Analysts don't like to cover litigations. They don't have the skillsets and most are zeros or heros in terms of results. I included a link to Yaron's writeup but i avoided a lot of technical language to make this more accessible. I would suggest reading it if you plan to invest.
Thanks for the great and structured summary.
I would have two questions:
1) As I am aware there is no Analyst coverage for the stock right?
2) Have you found any secondary sources for the Texas Court Cases or did you dig into the statements of charge to find numbers for the requested compensation for damages?
It's in the court documents if you dig around. Analysts don't like to cover litigations. They don't have the skillsets and most are zeros or heros in terms of results. I included a link to Yaron's writeup but i avoided a lot of technical language to make this more accessible. I would suggest reading it if you plan to invest.
Claims construction appears consistent with QCOM proposal. Curious how that impacts litigation odds.
I'm hoping with all the email and the win on the first case, the second one will go down smooth
Fun timing. This case needs to go to trial. That's the bottom line.
Shelf offering has been made effective. Probably the reason behind the price drop. What will be the dilution of current shareholders?
More court stuff/delays
https://x.com/killapabkai/status/1928253780967182718?s=46
Ugh brutal day to post, any idea why it's down today? Volume is low $-wise but relatively high.